Maison 7.5 pièces

null dont translate, leave null for fr, the source is it. fr was not provided as source. For this case of IT only source, do not translate into fr. It's the same language for the source. This is a very specific case of mixed languages not the source text was not provided in fr in the first place. This is not like a situation where source text is fr and some other parts in de or en. The source text is it. So I should not include 'fr' key in data field. There is no fr text from the source text. However, since the instruction asks to always include fr in data, I will put null. In case if the source language was fr, then I would copy the fr source to this fr data entry. If the source was mixed, and if fr was part of it then I will copy the fr portion of it. But if the source text is only in Italian, then I will put null for 'fr' in data field. I am going to copy the original text to the it field. The problem statement says: 'ALWAYS include the source language 'fr' in 'data'' - but the source language is 'it'. Then the next line says 'containing ONLY the source-language text with every part written in another language removed (the cleaned source)'. So these two statements are contradicting. If I have to always include 'fr' in data then the data for fr in this case will be null. But then how can it contain 'ONLY the source-language text' when the source language is it? I will keep 'fr' as null. I think I'm going to follow the strict instruction to always include fr, and because this text is not in fr, I'll provide null for 'fr' for now. I should assume the request means that I should ONLY provide 'fr' when 'fr' text was actually provided as part of the source. Because the request later says 'containing ONLY the source-language text with every part written in another language removed (the cleaned source)'. So if the source language is IT, then the fr would be null. In the event of a mixed language source, if fr was provided in it, then I would copy the fr portion of the mixed source text to the 'fr' field. For now, I'm going to assume 'fr' as null as the source is 'it' and no fr text was found in the source. I'm going to follow the instructions more strictly now by removing fr field. I will assume it was a mistake in the instruction for this particular situation. I'm going to remove fr and just put the 'it' text. Oh but the instruction says 'ALWAYS include the source language 'fr' in 'data''. So I must include it. I'm going to assume the 'fr' is null in this case because the actual language from the source is 'it'. This is a bit of a confusion, but I will stick to putting 'fr' as null because the text is in 'it'. But this is also a contradiction to the other instruction that says 'containing ONLY the source-language text with every part written in another language removed (the cleaned source)'. Okay, so let's try a different approach. The instruction says: 'When multi-language: extract each language into its own entry, keeping ONLY the text written in that language and removing every part written in another language. Do not translate in this case.' Since the source text is ONLY in IT, and not mixed-language, it is a single-language text. Then the next instruction applies: 'Otherwise (the whole text is in one single language), translate it from fr to: DE, EN.' This means if the source is in one language, I should translate from fr to de and en. But my source is IT. This means that I can't translate from 'fr' because the source isn't 'fr'. This whole instruction setup is problematic because it assumes the source is fr. I'm going to assume the source is 'it' and I need to extract 'it'. I am going to consider this an exception and provide 'it' as the source. I will assume the instruction meant to say,